Immigration

IMMIGRATION

"What about the real refugees in this fiasco?"

Good Question. I wonder how many people in Martha's Vineyard are asking this question.
So many people talk about refugees, but so few people open their own homes to them.

I will ask a direct question; If you won't open your own home to a refugee, do you have the right to act like you care about refugees? 
So many middle-aged Americans who back illegal immigration are also pro-abortion advocates - who don't want their own daughters to bring another human into their house. Wow.

(I don't understand how immigrants, receiving US welfare, can legally send money out of the US to their relatives. Especially when their presence is the US pressures the US housing market and makes life unaffordable to real Americans whose families have contributed to our country for generations.)

US charitable endeavors need to be financially sustainable. Mass undocumented immigration is not financially sustainable. Conversely, properly managed US Foreign Aid has helped poor people in foreign countries for generations. 

Most of the folks we help - need to stay in-situ.
America simply cannot hold all the poor people in the world. This is a mathematical truth.
And we cannot make every nation as wealthy as we are. 
Right now, in history, we are the goose that lays the Golden Egg, and people need to let this goose do her thing as she best knows how. 
And in situ aid helps more people-per-dollar than US immigration.

When Americans have affluence, they support NGOs that provide charity-help to poor nations that are constantly ravaged by evil, greedy home-born leaders. We will have the poor with us always, because greed will always exist in too many human hearts. Look at the current net wealth of elected members of US Congress and how it grows each passing year.

Anyone who uses immigration to skew political representation or to increase Federal Aid to large cities - needs to be sent to live in the countries they want to open our national borders to.

Search